The proposal has been recommended for refusal.
Link:
http://www.calgary.ca/docgallery/BU/dba ... 9_3829.pdf
Statistics: Posted by Chris E — Mon Mar 28, 2011 4:08 pm
]]>
“Consider varying roads rights-of-way when required to protect heritage resources.”
The additional principle was passed unanimously by the Committee and inspired the Aldermen to add the following Recommendation to the Report:
"Direct Administration to include as part of its policy, to allow for flexibility in rights-of-way where heritage, historical or architecturally significant buildings are concerned."
For full details of the committee meeting minutes, refer to the following link: http://publicaccess.calgary.ca/lldm01/l ... agenda#LPT.
Note: The above was passed by City Council unanimously on July 26, 2010Statistics: Posted by cjane — Fri Jul 16, 2010 3:56 pm
]]>
]]>
Good Day!!
Regards
Albert
_________
Statistics: Posted by Pink21 — Thu Sep 03, 2009 1:49 am
]]>
You can see a much larger image by visiting my Flickr site:
This image is the result of about 70 images, all sliced to the middle fifth, and blended together. It was about two days of work to create the final piece, and it still needs a few small touches. I have two other photo sets which include better sky and road portions at higher resolutions.
The last set is 'capped' with a panorama from the corner which swings around to catch the Arriva block as well.
Statistics: Posted by gerrystraathof — Tue Jul 22, 2008 4:05 pm
]]>
Statistics: Posted by newsposter — Tue Jul 15, 2008 7:27 pm
]]>
Photos here:
http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showpos ... count=3228
Statistics: Posted by Chris E — Mon Jul 14, 2008 6:18 pm
]]>
Another piece of Calgary's history is doomed
Calgary Herald
Monday, July 14, 2008
A demolition permit was recently issued for the Curtis Block on Macleod Trail and 12th Avenue, in view of the Stampede grounds. It is listed as a Category A heritage site, which according to city policy, means it is worthy of official designation and protection.
In this case, the developer (the Torode Group) offered to preserve the first metre of the building and incorporate the facade in the new project. Prevailing voices at the city insisted on a road widening setback that apparently makes this impractical. City Transportation wanted a 5.182 metre setback, while the developer proposed four metres. Extra vehicle lanes here are unworkable and inconsistent with planning directions for the area, so 100 years of history was traded for four more feet of sidewalk.
Volunteers of the Calgary Heritage Initiative Society strive to preserve heritage buildings. Although we do not know fully why the facade could not be incorporated with the full five-metre setback, we do appreciate the developer's willingness to provide a compromise that would have preserved a slice of the heritage. We are concerned that seemingly inflexible city requirements contributed to the loss of a unique piece of Calgary's history.
Does this decision reflect council's vision for our city? In a week where we celebrate our western history, this is a sad time for our local heritage.
Janet Woolgar, Calgary
Janet Woolgar is president of the Calgary Heritage Initiative Society
http://www.canada.com/calgaryherald/new ... a1afaa27eb
Statistics: Posted by newsposter — Mon Jul 14, 2008 2:23 pm
]]>
HERITAGE LOSES OUT TO WIDER SIDEWALK
While we celebrate our western heritage past with the Calgary Stampede, sadly, we are giving up on preserving a real piece of our local history that still exits. This history is embedded in the Curtis Block, one of the last remaining heritage buildings in the area of Macleod Trail and 12th Avenue SW. Permission has been granted by the City to demolish the building because no satisfactory agreement was able to be reached between the City and the developer.
Demolition is a common sight in Calgary. This site, however, is classified as a “Category A” heritage building on the City’s heritage inventory. This means that the building holds significant historic value to our city and could be protected as an official historic resource. Often developers are not inclined to save historic buildings. We find an exception here. The Torode Group is the owner of this site. John Torode’s group’s recent efforts include preserving the Victoria Park sandstone and bungalow schools on their Arriva condo project and refurbishing the historic Dominion Bridge site in Ramsay.
The City has never officially designated a building over the wishes of its owners. Instead, additional project density and other inducements are offered to encourage the developer to participate in preservation. In this case the developer did not require additional density, but still proposed to remove the brick façade, repair it, and put it back on the new building. However there were complications. The site is in the 1-in-100 year “flow zone” for Elbow River flooding, so bylaws require the ground floor of the building to be raised above grade. City transportation also wanted a 5.182 metre road widening setback from Macleod Trail. Torode’s proposal to save the façade was apparently contingent on a 4 metre setback. The City could have relaxed this setback by the difference (1.182 meters) but declined to compromise. Hence the developer sought a demolition permit that was issued on July 2, 2008. Extra vehicle lanes at this location are impractical and inconsistent with new planning directions for the area, so the extra space will be used for pedestrian improvements.
In short 100 years of history was traded for about four feet of sidewalk.
Our group, the Calgary Heritage Initiative Society is an independent group of volunteers that tries to preserve Calgary’s heritage. We are not privy to every design or financial detail so we do not know fully why the façade can’t be incorporated with the full setback and higher ground floor, or exactly why the extra meter is so imperative to some at the City. But we do appreciate the developer’s willingness to provide a compromise that would have preserved a slice of the heritage. It is obvious that the setback requirements of the transportation department carry a lot of weight in the planning decision-making process. In this case it was apparently enough to contribute significantly to the loss of a unique piece of Calgary history within sight of the Stampede Grounds.
Should this be the case? Should it stand as the precedent? Could not a compromise have been made somewhere? Does this decision reflect City Council’s current vision for our city? In a week where we celebrate our western history, this is a sad time for built heritage.
Janet Woolgar
President
Calgary Heritage Initiative Society
calgaryheritage.org
Statistics: Posted by newsposter — Sat Jul 12, 2008 6:27 pm
]]>
]]>
Relaxations of such requirements are in the City's power and it is very unfortunate that the Development Authority was unable to see the value in relaxing the setback to preserve some of the last authentic commercial facades in Victoria Park. This is particularly unfortunate given the recent Calgary Heritage Strategy, which is supposed to guide the City in such matters. It is also ironic given that "historicist" facades are typically applied to the base of new buildings in this area.
If you have concerns contact your alderman.
Statistics: Posted by newsposter — Wed Jul 02, 2008 9:15 am
]]>
image posting thanks to "Atlas Inc" at Calgary Construction Forum on www.skyscraperpage.com
Statistics: Posted by newsposter — Wed Nov 07, 2007 12:42 pm
]]>
]]>
]]>
See above for more ^
Statistics: Posted by newsposter — Tue Jul 24, 2007 2:02 pm
]]>